img01


“Just when I thought things couldn’t get any shadier, I’ve learned that the lobbyist now representing the Amazon Defense Coalition (via Kohn Swift & Graf, P.C.) in its $27 billion lawsuit against San Ramon, Calif.-based Chevron Corporation is the same man who represented Stanford Financial Group and its now-indicted founder R. Allen Stanford between 2002 and 2008.”
Read more »


“Last year Correa refused to repay $3.2 billion in global bonds over charges the debt was ‘illegally’ acquired by investors in league with corrupt government officials. His government later bought back most of the debt at very low prices, but analyst say the default will keep the Andean nation out of the debt markets for years.”
Read more »

“Chevron accuser paid $200K to Ecuador court’s economist”
By Zennie62 – sfgate.com blog “City Brights,” June 17, 2009

“Normally, an expert is called as a witness during a trial and represents one side, either the plaintiff or the defense. In this case, Ecuador had a court-appointed economist who’s by that title is supposed to be non-biased. But the discovery that Cabrera was paid $207,000 – and McCarty has photos of the check to prove it right on his blog – effectively tosses out any claim that Cabrera’s unbiased.”
Read more »

“Ecuador offensive fuels press freedom worries”
Reuters
, June 16, 2009
“Correa is widely seen as Ecuador’s most powerful leader since its return to democracy in 1979, but the threat to close Teleamazonas could hurt his popularity and reputation abroad.”
Read more »

“The Dubious Lawsuit against Chevron in Ecuador – Part 1″
The Oil Drum
, June 15, 2009
“It seems to me that the Amazon lawsuit is filled with myths, misunderstandings and out-and-out lies.”
Read more »

“Region silent amid attacks on the media”
By Andres Oppenheimer – The Miami Herald, June 11, 2009
“What’s most daunting about the latest attacks on the media is not that the narcissist-Leninist presidents of Ecuador and Venezuela are trying to silence independent media – - after all, they need a controlled press to fulfill their goals of becoming presidents for life — but the fact that leading democracies in the region are not sounding the alarm.”
Read more »

“What Will Be The Outcome of the Amazon Defense Coalition’s Lawsuit Against Chevron in Ecuador”
Bob McCarty Writes
, June 11, 2009
“Recently, I came into possession of copies of six checks totaling more than $206,000 and signed by Luis Yanza, a senior official with ADC (Amazon Defense Coalition)…I am, however, pointing out the undisputed fact that a ‘court-appointed expert’ of questionable qualifications was paid large sums of money by an Ecuadorian company established by the ADC, the financial beneficiary of the lawsuit.”
Read more »

FICTION:
“‘Chevron’s mischaracterization of the evidence against it in Ecuador is a clear example of insensitivity to human suffering and a failure to comply with the company’s legal obligations,’ said Pablo Fajardo, the lead lawyer in Ecuador for the Amazon communities.” - Amazon Defense Coalition Press Release: 6/4/09

FACT:
There is no question that the people of the Oriente region face a series of challenges regarding the health in their communities. However, they are being deceived by the trial lawyers and activists who have brought this lawsuit.

The major health concerns in the Oriente region are not the result of oil operations, but are related to a lack of water treatment infrastructure, a lack of sufficient sanitation infrastructure and inadequate access to medical care. The people there, like those in other parts of Ecuador, are suffering from a lack of proper municipal infrastructure for essential services like clean water and sewage treatment.

The truth is that the plaintiffs have not presented any medical evidence to support their accusations regarding health impacts. Moreover, Texaco Petroleum, as designated by the Ecuadorian Ministry of Energy and Mines and overseen by Petroecuador and the government of Ecuador, fully complied with legal obligations by performing remediation activity at 133 of the 321 Consortium well sites (equal to its stake in the consortium with Petroecuador). In fact, the cleanup work was supervised by the government of Ecuador and scientifically verified by two independent laboratories. As a result of the successful remediation, Texaco Petroleum was released of any further liability in Ecuador.